Mimic XR / Planning resource

VR training ROI calculator

Compare your current training costs with a VR scenario. Change the assumptions to see annual savings, first-year cost and simple payback.

VR headset, controllers and planning notes on a studio desk — AI-generated concept

Use your own costs.

The starting figures below are an illustrative scenario, not a Mimic XR quote, market benchmark or promised return. Enter costs on a consistent basis, including staff time, equipment, facilities and travel where relevant. Avoid counting the same cost twice.

Calculations happen in your browser. These inputs are not sent to Mimic XR or saved by this calculator.

How the calculation works

This model assumes the same learner volume and constant annual costs. It excludes financing, tax, discounting, inflation and unverified benefits such as fewer incidents. It does not establish learning effectiveness. If training capacity differs between scenarios, adjust the assumptions before comparing them.

Test the assumptions before approving a rollout.

Try a lower learner volume, higher maintenance cost and a slower rollout. Keep a record of what each input includes. A pilot should test both the delivery cost and the learning objective; savings alone do not make a training programme effective.

Why is the first-year result negative?

Setup costs can exceed the first year’s recurring savings. Review the assumptions and the intended useful life rather than treating a negative first year as an automatic rejection.

What if there is no positive annual saving?

The calculator shows no simple payback. Other benefits would need separate evidence and should not be invented to make the result positive.

Is this a price estimate?

No. Production scope, assets, scenarios, integrations and testing determine the project estimate. Use your own validated costs.

Explore XR training development or ask Mimic XR to review your training brief.